Inevitably, every human person has the
inner dynamism to crave for the Absolute Truth. Indeed, the quest which has
started since time immemorial continues even until now in order to ultimately quench
the thirst for such Being. Yet humans as we are wherein finitude becomes an act
of property, as it is embedded in our nature as a non-essential perfection
which necessarily flows from our being, the capacity to commit mistake
conclusion in relation to this search is inescapable. Be that as it may however,
with the help of intellectual studies and conventions which deal about the
topic, I may have a notion about this Being.
Neo-scholasticism has in fact one of
the best approaches in this study. This is because of its line of thinking as
having a cognitive propositional approach in dealing the reality of God (i.e
The Supreme Being, that which nothing Greater can be thought of). Cognitive Proportionalists
have clearly defined that the reality of God is knowable with certainty through
human expression and language although presumably they have conceived
supernatural revelation as a practical necessity for the communication of
doctrine.
As for me although apparently revelation
is intellectualized and reduced to a quantifiable set of propositional
statements according to critiques, I still firmly believe that this should not
be absolutely adjudicated to be in this way. This is because as presumed, God
reveals Himself where such revelation is developing through the signs of the
times. Although the concept of God ‘per se’ is beyond any human expression at
least, Neo-Scholasticism gives us the conviction that God is truly real. It might
be that the model is platonic-scholastic and pre-Freudan in character being
ignorant to the role of human emotions and instincts; epistemologically no
account of the diversity of people as regards to their capacity for
comprehending truth; and linguistically unaware of the limitations of language with
regards to encapsulating truth, however, the approach remains one of the best
means in the search of God’s existence. Certainly, Neo-scholastics’ utilization
of the cognitive propositional approach promotes unity in the church, fosters a
lively sense of mission and responds to the human need for answers. So therefore,
the model notwithstanding its weaknesses remains reliable to give us certain
truth especially about God. 